Equity trading strategy Archives

Dedicated short bias strategy

January 13, 2023 by Youssef LOURAOUI

In this article, Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022) presents the dedicated short bias strategy. The strategy holds a net short position, which implies more shorts (selling) than long (buying) positions. The objective of the dedicated bias strategy is to profit from shorting overvalued equities.

This article is structured as follow: we introduce the dedicated short bias strategy. Then, we present a practical case study to grasp the overall methodology of this strategy. We also present a performance analysis of this strategy and compare it a benchmark representing all hedge fund strategies (Credit Suisse Hedge Fund index) and a benchmark for the global equity market (MSCI All World Index).

Introduction

According to Credit Suisse (a financial institution publishing hedge fund indexes), a dedicated short bias strategy can be defined as follows: “Dedicated Short Bias funds take more short positions than long positions and earn returns by maintaining net short exposure in long and short equities. Detailed individual company research typically forms the core alpha generation driver of dedicated short bias managers, and a focus on companies with weak cash flow generation is common. To affect the short sale, the manager borrows the stock from a counter-party and sells it in the market. Short positions are sometimes implemented by selling forward. Risk management consists of offsetting long positions and stop-loss strategies”.

This strategy makes money by short selling overvalued equities. The strategy can potentially generate returns in falling markets but would underperform in rising equity market. The interesting characteristic of this strategy is that it can potentially offer to investors the added diversification by being non correlated with equity market returns.

Example of the dedicated short bias strategy

Jim Chanos (Kynikos Associates) short selling trade: Enron

In 2000, Enron dominated the raw material and energy industries. Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling were the two leaders of the group that disguised the company’s financial accounts for years. Enron’s directors, for instance, hid interminable debts in subsidiaries in order to create the appearance of a healthy parent company whose obligations were extremely limited because they were buried in the subsidiary accounts. Enron filed for bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, sparking a big scandal, pulling down the pension funds intended for the retirement of its employees, who were all laid off simultaneously. Arthur Andersen, Enron’s auditor, failed to detect the scandal, and the scandal ultimately led to the dissolution of one of the five largest accounting and audit firms in the world (restructuring the sector from the Big 5 to the Big 4). Figure 1 represents the share price of Enron across time.

Figure 1. Performance Enron across time.
img_SimTrade_Enron_performance
Source: Computation by the author

Fortune magazine awarded Enron Corporation “America’s Most Innovative Company” annually from 1996 to 2000. Enron Corporation was a supposedly extremely profitable energy and commodities company. At the beginning of 2001, Enron had around 20,000 employees and a market valuation of $60 billion, approximately 70 times its earnings.

Short seller James Chanos gained notoriety for identifying Enron’s problems early on. This trade was dubbed “the market call of the decade, if not the past fifty years” (Pederssen, 2015).

Risk of the dedicated short bias strategy

The most significant risk that can make this strategy loose money is a short squeeze. A short seller can borrow shares through a margin account if he/she believes a stock is overvalued and its price is expected to decline. The short seller will then sell the stock and deposit the money into his/her margin account as collateral. The seller will eventually have to repurchase the shares. If the price of the stock has decreased, the short seller gains money owing to the difference between the price of the stock sold on margin and the price of the stock paid later at the reduced price. Nonetheless, if the price rises, the buyback price may rise the initial sale price, and the short seller will be forced to sell the security quickly to avoid incurring even higher losses.

We illustrate below the risk of a dedicated short bias strategy with Gamestop.

Gamestop short squeeze

GameStop is best known as a video game retailer, with over 3,000 stores still in operation in the United States. However, as technology in the video game business advances, physical shops faced substantial problems. Microsoft and Sony have both adopted digital game downloads directly from their own web shops for their Xbox and Playstation systems. While GameStop continues to offer video games, the company has made steps to diversify into new markets. Toys and collectibles, gadgets, apparel, and even new and refurbished mobile phones are included.

However, given the increased short pressure by different hedge funds believing that the era of physical copies was dead, they started positioning in Gamestop stock and traded short in order to profit from the decrease in value. In this scenario, roughly 140% of GameStop’s shares were sold short in January 2021. In this case, investors have two choices: keep the short position or cover it (to buy back the borrowed securities in order to close out the open short position at a profit or loss). When the stock price rises, covering a short position means purchasing the shares at a loss since the stock price is now higher than what was sold. And when 140% of a stock’s float is sold short, a large number of positions are (have to be) closed. As a result, short sellers were constantly buying shares to cover their bets. When there is that much purchasing pressure, the stock mechanically continued to rise. From the levels reached in early 2020 to the levels reached in mid-2021, the stock price climbed by a factor of a nearly a hundred times (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Performance of Gamestop stock price.
Gamestop performance
Source: (Data: Tradingview)

In the Gamestop story, the short sellers lost huge amount of money. Especially, the hedge fund Melvin Capital lost billions of dollars after being on the wrong side of the GameStop short squeeze.

Why should I be interested in this post?

Understanding the profits and risks of such a strategy might assist investors in incorporating this hedge fund strategy into their portfolio allocation.

Useful resources

Academic research

Pedersen, L. H., 2015. Efficiently Inefficient: How Smart Money Invests and Market Prices Are Determined. Princeton University Press.

Business Analysis

Credit Suisse Hedge fund strategy

Credit Suisse Hedge fund performance

Wikipedia Gamestop short squeeze

TradingView, 2023 Gamestop stock price historical chart

About the author

The article was written in January 2023 by Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022).

Equity market neutral strategy

January 11, 2023 by Youssef LOURAOUI

In this article, Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022) presents the equity market neutral strategy. The objective of the equity market neutral strategy is to benefit from both long and short positions while minimizing the exposure to the equity market fluctuations.

This article is structured as follow: we introduce the equity market neutral strategy. Then, we present a practical case study to grasp the overall methodology of this strategy. We conclude with a performance analysis of this strategy in comparison with a global benchmark (MSCI All World Index and the Credit Suisse Hedge Fund index).

Introduction

According to Credit Suisse (a financial institution publishing hedge fund indexes), an equity market neutral strategy can be defined as follows: “Equity Market Neutral funds take both long and short positions in stocks while minimizing exposure to the systematic risk of the market (i.e., a beta of zero is desired). Funds seek to exploit investment opportunities unique to a specific group of stocks, while maintaining a neutral exposure to broad groups of stocks defined for example by sector, industry, market capitalization, country, or region. There are a number of sub- sectors including statistical arbitrage, quantitative long/short, fundamental long/short and index arbitrage”. This strategy makes money by holding assets that are decorrelated from a specific benchmark. The strategy can potentially generate returns in falling markets.

Mathematical foundation for the beta

This strategy relies heavily on the beta, derived from the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). Under this framework, we can relate the expected return of a given asset and its risk:

Where :

E(r) represents the expected return of the asset
r_f the risk-free rate
β a measure of the risk of the asset
E(r_m) the expected return of the market
E(r_m) – r_f represents the market risk premium.

In this model, the beta (β) parameter is a key parameter and is defined as:

Where:

Cov(r, r_m) represents the covariance of the asset return with the market return
σ²(r_m) is the variance of market return.

The beta is a measure of how sensitive an asset is to market swings. This risk indicator aids investors in predicting the fluctuations of their asset in relation to the wider market. It compares the volatility of an asset to the systematic risk that exists in the market. The beta is a statistical term that denotes the slope of a line formed by a regression of data points comparing stock returns to market returns. It aids investors in understanding how the asset moves in relation to the market. According to Fama and French (2004), there are two ways to interpret the beta employed in the CAPM:

According to the CAPM formula, beta may be thought in mathematical terms as the slope of the regression of the asset return on the market return observed on different periods. Thus, beta quantifies the asset sensitivity to changes in the market return;
According to the beta formula, it may be understood as the risk that each dollar invested in an asset adds to the market portfolio. This is an economic explanation based on the observation that the market portfolio’s risk (measured by 〖σ(r_m)〗^2) is a weighted average of the covariance risks associated with the assets in the market portfolio, making beta a measure of the covariance risk associated with an asset in comparison to the variance of the market return.

Additionally, the CAPM makes a distinction between two forms of risk: systematic and specific risk. Systematic risk refers to the risk posed by all non-diversifiable elements such as monetary policy, political events, and natural disasters. By contrast, specific risk refers to the risk inherent in a particular asset and so is diversifiable. As a result, the CAPM solely captures systematic risk via the beta measure, with the market’s beta equal to one, lower-risk assets having a beta less than one, and higher-risk assets having a beta larger than one.

Application of an equity market neutral strategy

For the purposes of this example, let us assume that a portfolio manager wants to invest $100 million across a diverse equity portfolio while maintaining market-neutral exposure to market index changes. To create an equity market-neutral portfolio, we use five stocks from the US equity market: Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, and Pfizer. Using monthly data from Bloomberg for the period from 1999 to 2022, we compute the returns of these stocks and their beta with the US equity index (S&P500). Using the solver function on Excel, we find the weights of the portfolio with the maximum expected return with a beta equal to zero.

Table 1 displays the target weights needed to build a portfolio with a neutral view on the equity market. As shown by the target allocation in Table 1, we can immediately see a substantial position of 186.7 million dollars on Pfizer while keeping a short position on the remaining equity positions of the portfolio totaling 86.7 million dollars in short positions. Given that the stocks on the short list have high beta values (more than one), this allocation makes sense. Pfizer is the only defensive stock and has a beta of 0.66 in relation to the S&P 500 index.

If the investment manager allocated capital in the following way, he would create an equity market neutral portfolio with a beta of zero:

Apple: -$4.6 million (-4.6% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of -0.066)
Amazon: -$39.9 million (-39.9% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of -0.592)
Microsoft: -$16.2 million (-16.2% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of -0.192)
Goldman Sachs: -$26 million (-26% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of -0.398)
Pfizer: $186.7 million (186.7% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of 1.247)

Table 1. Target weights to achieve an equity market neutral portfolio.
Source: computation by the author (Data: Bloomberg)

You can find below the Excel spreadsheet that complements the explanations about the equity market neutral portfolio.

An extension of the equity market neutral strategy to other asset classes

A portfolio with a beta of zero, or zero systematic risk, is referred to as a zero-beta portfolio. A portfolio with a beta of zero would have an expected return equal to the risk-free rate. Given that its expected return is equal to the risk-free rate or is relatively low compared to portfolios with a higher beta. Such portfolio would have no correlation with market movements.

Since a zero-beta portfolio has no market exposure and would consequently underperform a diversified market portfolio, it is highly unlikely that investors will be interested in it during bull markets. During a bear market, it may garner some interest, but investors are likely to ask if investing in risk-free, short-term Treasuries is a better and less expensive alternative to a zero-beta portfolio.

For this example, we imagine the case of a portfolio manager wishing to invest 100M$ across a diversified portfolio, while holding a zero-beta portfolio with respect to a broad equity index benchmark. To recreate a diversified portfolio, we compiled a shortlist of trackers that would represent our investment universe. To maintain a balanced approach, we selected trackers that would represent the main asset classes: global stocks (VTI – Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF), bonds (IEF – iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF and TLT – iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF), and commodities (DBC – Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and GLD – SPDR Gold Shares).

To construct the zero-beta portfolio, we pulled a ten-year time series from Refinitiv Eikon and calculated the beta of each asset relative to the broad stock index benchmark (VTI tracker). The target weights to create a zero-beta portfolio are shown in Table 2. As captured by the target allocation in Table 2, we can clearly see an important weight for bonds of different maturities (56.7%), along with a 33.7% towards commodities and a small allocation towards global equity equivalent to 9.6% (because of the high beta value).

If the investment manager allocated capital in the following way, he would create a zero-beta portfolio with a beta of zero:

VTI: $9.69 million (9.69% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of 0.097)
IEF: $18.99 million (18.99% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of -0.029)
GLD: $18.12 million (18.12% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of 0.005)
DBC: $15.5 million (15.50% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of 0.070)
TLT: $37.7 million (37.7% of the portfolio; a weighted-beta of -0.143)

Table 2. Target weights to achieve a zero-beta portfolio.
Source: computation by the author. (Data: Reuters Eikon)

You can find below the Excel spreadsheet that complements the explanations about the zero beta portfolio.

Performance of the equity market neutral strategy

To capture the performance of the equity market neutral strategy, we use the Credit Suisse hedge fund strategy index. To establish a comparison between the performance of the global equity market and the equity market neutral strategy, we examine the rebased performance of the Credit Suisse managed futures index with respect to the MSCI All-World Index.

The equity market neutral strategy generated an annualized return of -0.18% with an annualized volatility of 7.5%, resulting in a Sharpe ratio of -0.053. During the same time period, the Credit Suisse Hedge Fund index had an annualized return of 4.34 percent with an annualized volatility of 5.64 percent, resulting in a Sharpe ratio of 0.174. With a neutral market beta exposure of 0.04, the results are consistent with the theory that this approach does not carry the equity risk premium. This aspect justifies the underperformance.

Figure 1 gives the performance of the equity market neutral funds (Credit Suisse Equity Market Neutral Index) compared to the hedge funds (Credit Suisse Hedge Fund index) and the world equity funds (MSCI All-World Index) for the period from July 2002 to April 2021.

Figure 1. Performance of the equity market neutral strategy.

Source: computation by the author (Data: Bloomberg)

You can find below the Excel spreadsheet that complements the explanations about the Credit Suisse equity market neutral strategy.

Why should I be interested in this post?

Understanding the performance and risk of the equity market neutral strategy might assist investors in incorporating this hedge fund strategy into their portfolio allocation.

Useful resources

Academic research

Pedersen, L. H., 2015. Efficiently Inefficient: How Smart Money Invests and Market Prices Are Determined. Princeton University Press.

Business Analysis

Credit Suisse Hedge fund strategy

Credit Suisse Hedge fund performance

Credit Suisse Equity market neutral strategy

Credit Suisse Equity market neutral performance benchmark

About the author

The article was written in January 2023 by Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022).

Quantitative equity investing

December 19, 2022 by Youssef LOURAOUI

In this article, Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022) elaborates on the concept of quantitative equity investing, a type of investment approach in the equity trading space.

This article follows the following structure: we introduce the quantitative equity investing. We present a review of the major types of quantitative equity strategies and we finish with a conclusion.

Introduction

Quantitative equity investing refers to funds that uses model-driven decision making when trading in the equity space. Quantitative analysts program their trading rules into computer systems and use algorithmic trading, which is overseen by humans.

Quantitative investing has several advantages and disadvantages over discretionary trading. The disadvantages are that the trading rule cannot be as personalized to each unique case and cannot be dependent on “soft” information such human judgment. These disadvantages may be lessened as processing power and complexity improve. For example, quantitative models may use textual analysis to examine transcripts of a firm’s conference calls with equity analysts, determining whether certain phrases are commonly used or performing more advanced analysis.

The advantages of quantitative investing include the fact that it may be applied to a diverse group of stocks, resulting in great diversification. When a quantitative analyst builds an advanced investment model, it can be applied to thousands of stocks all around the world at the same time. Second, the quantitative modeling rigor may be able to overcome many of the behavioral biases that commonly impact human judgment, including those that produce trading opportunities in the first place. Third, using past data, the quant’s trading principles can be backtested (Pedersen, 2015).

Types of quantitative equity strategies

There are three types of quantitative equity strategies: fundamental quantitative investing, statistical arbitrage, and high-frequency trading (HFT). These three types of quantitative investing differ in various ways, including their conceptual base, turnover, capacity, how trades are determined, and their ability to be backtested.

Fundamental quantitative investing

Fundamental quantitative investing, like discretionary trading, tries to use fundamental analysis in a systematic manner. Fundamental quantitative investing is thus founded on economic and financial theory, as well as statistical data analysis. Given that prices and fundamentals only fluctuate gradually, fundamental quantitative investing typically has a turnover of days to months and a high capacity (meaning that a large amount of money can be invested in the strategy), owing to extensive diversification.

Statistical arbitrage

Statistical arbitrage aims to capitalize on price differences between closely linked stocks. As a result, it is founded on a grasp of arbitrage relations and statistics, and its turnover is often faster than that of fundamental quants. Statistical arbitrage has a lower capacity due to faster trading (and possibly fewer stocks having arbitrage spreads).

High Frequency Trading (HFT)

HFT is based on statistics, information processing, and engineering, as the success of an HFT is determined in part by the speed with which they can trade. HFTs focus on having superfast computers and computer programs, as well as co-locating their computers at exchanges, actually trying to get their computer as close to the exchange server as possible, using fast cables, and so on. HFTs have the fastest trading turnover and, as a result, the lowest capacity.

The three types of quants also differ in how they make trades: Fundamental quants typically make their deals ex ante, statistical arbitrage traders make their trades gradually, and high-frequency traders let the market make their transactions. A fundamental quantitative model, for example, identifies high-expected-return stocks and then buys them, almost always having their orders filled; a statistical arbitrage model seeks to buy a mispriced stock but may terminate the trading scheme before completion if prices have moved adversely; and, finally, an HFT model may submit limit orders to both buy and sell to several exchanges, allowing the market to determine which ones are hit. Because of this trading structure, fundamental quant investing can be simulated with some reliability via a backtest; statistical arbitrage backtests rely heavily on assumptions on execution times, transaction costs, and fill rates; and HFT strategies are frequently difficult to simulate reliably, so HFTs must rely on experiments.

Table 1. Quantitative equity investing main categories and characteristics.

Source: Source: Pedersen, 2015.

Conclusion

Quants run their models on hundreds, if not thousands, of stocks. Because diversification eliminates most idiosyncratic risk, firm-specific shocks tend to wash out at the portfolio level, and any single position is too tiny to make a major impact in performance.

An equity market neutral portfolio eliminates total stock market risk by being equally long and short. Some quants attempt to establish market neutrality by ensuring that the long side’s dollar exposure equals the dollar worth of all short bets. This technique, however, is only effective if the longs and shorts are both equally risky. As a result, quants attempt to balance market beta on both the long and short sides. Some quants attempt to be both dollar and beta neutral.

Why should I be interested in this post?

It may provide an opportunity for investors to diversify their global portfolios. Including hedge funds in a portfolio can help investors obtain absolute returns that are uncorrelated with typical bond/equity returns.

For practitioners, learning how to incorporate hedge funds into a standard portfolio and understanding the risks associated with hedge fund investing can be beneficial.

Understanding if hedge funds are truly providing “excess returns” and deconstructing the sources of return can be beneficial to academics. Another challenge is determining whether there is any “performance persistence” in hedge fund returns.

Getting a job at a hedge fund might be a profitable career path for students. Understanding the market, the players, the strategies, and the industry’s current trends can help you gain a job as a hedge fund analyst or simply enhance your knowledge of another asset class.

Useful resources

Academic research

Pedersen, L. H., 2015. Efficiently Inefficient: How Smart Money Invests and Market Prices Are Determined. Chapter 9 : 133 – 164. Princeton University Press.

About the author

The article was written in December 2022 by Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022).

Long-short equity strategy

December 17, 2022 by Youssef LOURAOUI

In this article, Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022) presents the long-short equity strategy, one of pioneer strategies in the hedge fund industry. The goal of the long-short equity investment strategy is to buy undervalued stocks and sell short overvalued ones.

This article is structured as follow: we introduce the long-short strategy principle. Then, we present a practical case study to grasp the overall methodology of this strategy. We conclude with a performance analysis of this strategy in comparison with a global benchmark (MSCI All World Index).

Introduction

According to Credit Suisse, a long-short strategy can be defined as follows: “Long-short equity funds invest on both long and short sides of equity markets, generally focusing on diversifying or hedging across particular sectors, regions, or market capitalizations. Managers have the flexibility to shift from value to growth; small to medium to large capitalization stocks; and net long to net short. Managers can also trade equity futures and options as well as equity related securities and debt or build portfolios that are more concentrated than traditional long-only equity funds.”

This strategy has the particularity of potentially generate returns in both rising and falling markets. However, stock selection is key concern, and the stock picking ability of the fund manager is what makes this strategy profitable (or not!). The trade-off of this approach is to reduce market risk but exchange it for specific risk. Another key characteristic of this type of strategy is that overall, funds relying on long-short are net long in their trading exposure (long bias).

Equity strategies

In the equity universe, we can separate long-short equity strategies into discretionary long-short equity, dedicated short bias, and quantitative.

Discretionary long-short

Discretionary long-short equity managers typically decide whether to buy or sell stocks based on a basic review of the value of each firm, which includes evaluating its growth prospects and comparing its profitability to its valuation. By visiting managers and firms, these fund managers also evaluate the management of the company. Additionally, they investigate the accounting figures to judge their accuracy and predict future cash flows. Equity long-short managers typically predict on particular companies, but they can also express opinions on entire industries.

Value investors, a subset of equity managers, concentrate on acquiring undervalued companies and holding these stocks for the long run. A good illustration of a value investor is Warren Buffett. Since companies only become inexpensive when other investors stop investing in them, putting this trading approach into practice frequently entails being a contrarian (buy assets after a price decrease). Because of this, cheap stocks are frequently out of favour or purchased while others are in a panic. Traders claim that deviating from the standard is more difficult than it seems.

Dedicated short bias

Like equity long-short managers, dedicated short bias is a trading technique that focuses on identifying companies to sell short. Making a prediction that the share price will decline is known as short selling. Similar to how purchasing stock entails profiting if the price increases, holding a short position entail profiting if the price decreases. Dedicated short-bias managers search for companies that are declining. Since dedicated short-bias managers are working against the prevailing uptrend in markets since stocks rise more frequently than they fall (this is known as the equity risk premium), they make up a very small proportion of hedge funds.

Most hedge funds in general, as well as almost all equity long-short hedge funds and dedicated short-bias hedge funds, engage in discretionary trading, which refers to the trader’s ability to decide whether to buy or sell based on his or her judgement and an evaluation of the market based on past performance, various types of information, intuition, and other factors.

Quantitative

The quantitative investment might be seen as an alternative to this traditional style of trading. Quants create systems that methodically carry out the stated definitions of their trading rules. They use complex processing of ideas that are difficult to analyse using non-quantitative methods to gain a slight advantage on each of the numerous tiny, diversified trades. To accomplish this, they combine a wealth of data with tools and insights from a variety of fields, including economics, finance, statistics, mathematics, computer science, and engineering, to identify relationships that market participants may not have immediately fully incorporated in the price. Quantitative traders use computer systems that use these relationships to generate trading signals, optimise portfolios considering trading expenses, and execute trades using automated systems that send hundreds of orders every few seconds. In other words, data is fed into computers that execute various programmes under the supervision of humans to conduct trading (Pedersen, 2015).

Example of a long-short equity strategy

The purpose of employing a long-short strategy is to profit in both bullish and bearish markets. To measure the profitability of this strategy, we implemented a long-short strategy from the beginning of January 2022 to June 2022. In this time range, we are long Exxon Mobile stock and short Tesla. The data are extracted from the Bloomberg terminal. The strategy of going long Exxon Mobile and short Tesla is purely educational. This strategy’s basic idea is to profit from rising oil prices (leading to a price increase for Exxon Mobile) and rising interest rates (leading to a price decrease for Tesla). Over the same period, the S&P 500 index has dropped 23%, while the Nasdaq Composite has lost more than 30%. The Nasdaq Composite is dominated by rapidly developing technology companies that are especially vulnerable to rising interest rates.

Overall, the market’s net exposure is zero because we are 100% long Exxon Mobile and 100% short Tesla stock. This strategy succeeded to earn significant returns in both the long and short legs of the trade over a six-month timeframe. It yielded a 99.5 percent return, with a 36.8 percent gain in the value of the Exxon Mobile shares and a 62.8 percent return on the short Tesla position. Figure 1 shows the overall performance of each equity across time.

Figure 1. Long-short equity strategy performance over time
Time-series regression
Source: computation by the author (Data: Bloomberg)

You can find below the Excel spreadsheet that complements the example above.

Performance of the long-short equity strategy

To capture the performance of the long-short equity strategy, we use the Credit Suisse hedge fund strategy index. To establish a comparison between the performance of the global equity market and the long-short hedge fund strategy, we examine the rebased performance of the Credit Suisse index with respect to the MSCI All-World Index. Over a period from 2002 to 2022, the long-short equity strategy index managed to generate an annualised return of 5.96% with an annualised volatility of 7.33%, leading to a Sharpe ratio of 0.18. Over the same period, the MSCI All World Index managed to generate an annualised return of 6.00% with an annualised volatility of 15.71%, leading to a Sharpe ratio of 0.11. The low correlation of the long-short equity strategy with the MSCI All World Index is equal to 0.09, which is closed to zero. Overall, the Credit Suisse hedge fund strategy index performed somewhat slightly worse than the MSCI All World Index, but presented a much lower volatility leading to a higher Sharpe ratio (0.18 vs 0.11).

Figure 2. Performance of the long-short equity strategy compared to the MSCI All-World Index across time.
Time-series regression
Source: computation by the author (Data: Bloomberg)

You can find below the Excel spreadsheet that complements the explanations about the Credit Suisse hedge fund strategy index.

Why should I be interested in this post?

Long-short funds seek to reduce negative risk while increasing market upside. They might, for example, invest in inexpensive stocks that the fund managers believe will rise in price while simultaneously shorting overvalued stocks to cut losses. Other strategies used by long-short funds to lessen market volatility include leverage and derivatives. Understanding the profits and risks of such a strategy might assist investors in incorporating this hedge fund strategy into their portfolio allocation.

Useful resources

Academic research

Pedersen, L. H., 2015. Efficiently Inefficient: How Smart Money Invests and Market Prices Are Determined. Princeton University Press.

Business Analysis

BlackRock Long-short strategy

BlackRock Investment Outlook

Credit Suisse Hedge fund strategy

Credit Suisse Hedge fund performance

Credit Suisse Long-short strategy

Credit Suisse Long-short performance benchmark

About the author

The article was written in December 2022 by Youssef LOURAOUI (Bayes Business School, MSc. Energy, Trade & Finance, 2021-2022).

Introduction

Example of the dedicated short bias strategy

Jim Chanos (Kynikos Associates) short selling trade: Enron

Risk of the dedicated short bias strategy

Gamestop short squeeze

Why should I be interested in this post?

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

Hedge funds

Financial techniques

Useful resources

Academic research

Business Analysis

About the author

Introduction

Mathematical foundation for the beta

Application of an equity market neutral strategy

An extension of the equity market neutral strategy to other asset classes

Performance of the equity market neutral strategy

Why should I be interested in this post?

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

Hedge funds

Financial techniques

Useful resources

Academic research

Business Analysis

About the author

Introduction

Types of quantitative equity strategies

Fundamental quantitative investing

Statistical arbitrage

High Frequency Trading (HFT)

Conclusion

Why should I be interested in this post?

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

Useful resources

Academic research

About the author

Introduction

Equity strategies

Discretionary long-short

Dedicated short bias

Quantitative

Example of a long-short equity strategy

Performance of the long-short equity strategy

Why should I be interested in this post?

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

Useful resources

Academic research

Business Analysis

About the author