Price Fixing

Price fixing

Akshit GUPTA

This article written by Akshit GUPTA (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022) presents the concept of Price Fixing.

Definition

Price fixing refers to an agreement between two or more participants operating in a market to collude and set the prices of an asset to serve their interest. In financial markets, price fixing refers to a form of market manipulation where the manipulators rig asset prices by inflating or deflating them to benefit from such practices. The main markets where price fixing takes place are for the following assets: interest rates, currencies and commodities.

The price fixing practice works in contradiction to the free and fair financial market forces and hampers public confidence in the markets. The asset prices should be decided by the natural market forces of supply and demand. Price fixing is banned and deemed illegal across global financial markets and stringent regulations.

In the United States of America, several laws have been implemented including the Sherman Act of 1890, which prohibits any form of price fixing or collusion among financial institutions to fix asset prices. The market manipulation tactic of price fixing comes with severe civil and criminal liabilities along with heavy penalties (see the example of the Libor scandal below).

Mechanisms

Price fixing can take different forms: collusion among market participants and window dressing.

Collusion among market participants

In such a form of price fixing, the market participants operating on the same side of a market often collude to set the buying or selling prices of an asset to manipulate the asset prices and serve their personal interest.

Window dressing

It is often carried out to give an artificial appearance to assets offered by certain companies, done by window dressing their creditworthiness and inflating the demand for the financial products offered.

Examples of price fixing

The Libor Scandal

Price fixing came to light when the Libor scandal was uncovered in 2012.

What is Libor?

Libor (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) is a benchmark interest rate that is decided on the basis of the average inter-bank unsecured borrowing rates over a short-term period ranging from 1 day to 1 year. It is computed on a daily basis by the ICE Benchmark Committee working under Intercontinental Exchange, which is the overseeing body for Libor. Every day, at 11:00 AM, major banks from all across the world submit their borrowing interest to the ICE Benchmark Committee.

The Libor rate is used worldwide by major financial institutions to determine interest rates for different loans (for corporations to finance their investments and operational activities, for individuals to finance their consumption and the acquisition of their home, students to finance their studies, etc.) and the flows of financial derivatives.

How the Libor is calculated on a daily basis?
As seen in the picture, 18 major banks from all across the world sends their estimated unsecured borrowing rates on a daily basis at 11 AM to the ICE Benchmark Committee.

The committee then ranks the rates in a top to down order and eliminates the top and bottom 25% of the outliers from the list. The remaining rates are then averaged out and a five decimal Libor figure is issued at 11:55 AM on a daily basis. The committee issues the Libor in 5 currencies and with 7 different maturities, thus issuing a total of 35 different rates. The three-month US Libor is generally termed as the current Libor rate.

Picture 2

What happened?

A pool of banks colluded to artificially inflate or deflate the Libor rate over a couple of decades. The traders working at these banks submitted higher or lower rates to the ICE Benchmark Committee than they actually paid for unsecured short-term borrowings to manipulate the Libor on a daily basis. The price fixing was carried out to benefit traders and banks who traded financial derivatives to make profits by artificially inflating or deflating the Libor, which was the reference rate for such instruments.

The Libor scandal was unearthed in 2012 when a series of international investigation uncovered the price-fixing activities that were carried out by banks that formed a major part of the group of banks submitting their borrowing rates.

The Libor is used worldwide and the price fixing impacted millions of honest people around the globe, who took loans on inflated fixed Libor, and companies, which held derivative contracts.

The investigation led to fines amounting to $9 billion for the major banks that were involved in the scandal including Citi Bank, Barclays, JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland. Many individual brokers and traders working for these banks were also sued by the regulatory bodies and charged with severe punishments and fines.

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Securities and Exchange Commission

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Price fixing

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Corner

To know more about price fixing

The links mentioned below provides a comprehensive picture of how price fixing works in the financial markets and also provides a deeper view of the different scandals that happened using price fixing manipulation and shook the world.

About the Libor scandal

Wikipedia Libor Scandal

About the author

Article written in December 2020 by Akshit GUPTA (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022).

Spoofing

Spoofing

Akshit Gupta

This article written by Akshit Gupta (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2022) presents the technique of spoofing, which is a type of market manipulation in financial markets.

Definition

Spoofing is a form of market manipulation in which a trader places a large order to buy or sell a financial asset with no intention of execution of the order but to create the illusion of a change in the demand and/or supply for the asset and eventually maneuver market prices. Upon receiving the market response, the trader then cancels his or her order and then benefits from other investors’ reactions by trading on the asset thus earning huge but illegitimate payoffs. Spoofing is usually based on algorithmic trading, which allows to trade in the market at high speed.

Spoofing Mechanism

Under spoofing, the manipulator places small buy or sell orders at shorter time frames near the best bid (or ask) price in a manner that the order has very less probability of being executed in the market. The orders are placed in such a manner that creates a misleading impression of increasing liquidity in the market. The orders help in creating artificial demand/supply for the asset in the market and lures other investor’s interest towards the asset. The manipulator doesn’t have the intent of executing the order and generally takes advantage of the price movements that might result from the misleading impression of increasing liquidity that the orders created.
Picture 1

Spoofing and financial regulation

According to the Financial Conduct Authority, “Abusive strategies that act to the detriment of consumers or market integrity will not be tolerated” and Spoofing, being a type of market manipulation, is an illegal practice in UK accompanying penalties. In U.S. too, as per the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, Spoofing is unsanctioned by law. Despite the criminal liability, however, some institutions and individuals continue to get involved in it for undue gains.

Spoofing and high frequency trading

Spoofing has been around for decades as traders attempt to take advantage of other market participants by artificially inflating or deflating the price of an asset. Spoofing became more prominent in the 2010s with the rise of High Frequency Trading (HFT) which is a powerful, automated way to transact a large number of orders at very high speed. HFT provides opportunities for price manipulation through spoofing as orders can be placed and canceled very quickly. However, with time, it also attracted the notice of financial regulators and law enforcement officials as the following case will explain.

The ‘2010 Flash Crash’

Picture 2
On May 6, 2010, a dramatic decline was seen in the US stock market as the Dow Jones Industrial Average index fell more than 1,000 points in 10 minutes along with other stock market indexes such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite. Over one trillion dollars of market capitalization were wiped out, though 70% was regained back by the market before the end of the day. This dramatic event has been named the ‘2010 Flash Crash’.

Among a frenzy of speculation, the cause for this market crash was attributed to some big HFT bets on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. London-based futures trader Navinder Sarao was actually spoofing in the e-Mini S&P 500 contracts.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) alleged that Sarao’s use of the dynamic layering technique contributed to an order book imbalance between buy-side and sell-side orders, which created downward pressure on prices in the market, especially given the size of orders he was placing. The CFTC said that Sarao made $879,018 in net profits in the e-Mini S&P 500 contracts that day.

Relevance to the SimTrade certificate

The concept of spoofing relates to the SimTrade certificate in many ways:

About theory

  • By taking the Exchange orders course, you will know more about the different type of orders that you can use to buy and sell assets in financial markets.
  • By taking the Market information course, you will understand how information is incorporated into market prices and the associated concept of market efficiency.

Take SimTrade courses

About practice

  • By launching the Sending an Order simulation, you will practice how financial markets really work and how to act in the market by sending orders.
  • By launching the Efficient market simulation, you will practice how information is incorporated into market prices through the trading of market participants, and grasp the concept of market efficiency.

Take SimTrade courses

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Market manipulation

Article written by Akshit Gupta (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2022).

Market manipulation

Market manipulation

Akshit GUPTA

This article written by Akshit GUPTA (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022). presents the concept of market manipulation.

Definition

Market manipulation refers to a deliberate attempt made by a person or a group of people to artificially inflate or deflate the price of stocks, commodities or currencies, and hamper the free and fair operations of the financial markets. It is a type of market abuse which is done to ensure personal profits and gains. The person doing market manipulation has the intent to influence the prices of the stocks, commodities or currencies in his favor.

Market manipulation is banned in almost all the developed financial markets around the globe including USA (under Section 9.a.2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and the European Union (under the Article 12 of Market Abuse Regulations on insider trading and market manipulation). With the rising complexity and trade volumes in the financial markets today, it is becoming increasingly difficult for market regulators to catch the culprits who practice market manipulation. However, the laws for market manipulation are very strict and often comes with severe repercussions which involves both civil as well as criminal liabilities for the person or group involved.

Forms of market manipulations

Market manipulation can take different forms. Some of the most common types of market manipulation activities involve:

False information

The rise of technology and digital media in the recent years has spiked up the amount and reach of false or fake news that circulates in the market on a regular basis. The false news that is circulated to benefit certain investors or companies leads to market manipulation and comes with severe repercussions for the culprits.

Pump and dump

This is one of the most common form of market manipulation which involves inflating the prices of a lesser known company such as a microcap or a nanocap company by circulating misleading information and dumping the stocks once the prices of such companies has risen. The manipulator (or promoter) of such schemes has the intention to create artificial demand for such stocks and thereby generate quick profits.

Insider trading

This form of market manipulation involves an insider (a person related to the company or any of its employee with access to sensitive information) who uses non-public confidential information about a company, and generates profits or avoid losses by executing trades in the market based on such information.

Spoofing

In this form of market manipulation, a trader places large volume of buy or sell orders
without the intention of executing them. The orders are placed to attract the attention of other investors who would try to bet in the stock seeing the large order in the trading book. Such acts are usually carried out using high frequency algorithms and help the trader to manipulate the market in his favor.

Cornering

In cornering, an investor or a group of investors buy significantly large volume of commodities or shares in order to sway the market in their favor and create a monopoly by controlling the prices and the supply for the asset.

Wash trading

In this form of market manipulation, a trader or a group of traders continuously buy and sell securities within themselves to hype up the trade volumes for such assets. This attracts the attention of other market participants and creates a false illusion about the asset and helps in increasing the demand.

Bear raiding

The traders who enter long positions in the market, sometimes use stop loss orders to protect their position from a significant price decline (risk management). Bear raiding involves selling large quantities of stocks of a company thereby decreasing its stock price. This downward trend in the stock price usually triggers the stop loss orders of traders with long positions, and further decreases the stock price in mechanical way.

Examples of market manipulation

WorldCom (2002)

A formerly world-renowned telecommunications company came under the scanner of U.S. financial regulators in early 2000s. The company was charged for manipulating their financial books by showing high profits and thereby manipulating the stock prices for the company. The ‘Book Cooking’ fraud done by WorldCom amounted to $3.8 billion. After the charges were proved, the company had to bear severe repercussions and eventually filed for bankruptcy in July 2002.

JP Morgan Chase (2020)

Many investors filed a case against JP Morgan Chase for manipulating the prices for the silver futures and US Treasury markets, and harming the interests of honest investors by artificially lowering down the prices of these securities. The bank made huge profits over the years and recently agreed to such charges and paid a penalty amounting to $920 million to settle the investigation carried by market regulators and law enforcement authorities. The manipulation involved ‘spoofing’ carried out by employees at J.P. Morgan Chase, many of whom are now facing criminal proceedings.

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Securities and Exchange Commission

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Price fixing

   ▶ Akshit GUPTA Corner

About the author

Article written in December 2020 by Akshit GUPTA (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022).

Analysis of the movie Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

Analysis of the movie Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

Akshit Gupta

This article written by Akshit Gupta (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022) analyzes the movie Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010) and explains the key financial concepts related to this movie.

The Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps movie released in 2010 is an American financial drama film and a sequel of the famous Wall Street movie (released in 1987). The story of the movie is set around the 2008 financial crisis and depicts the financial markets prevalent in the USA.

Key characters in the movie

  • Gordon Gekko: a famous Wall Street investor
  • Winnie Gekko: the daughter of Gordon Gekko and the owner of a non-profit news website
  • Jacob Moore: a famous trader at Keller Zebel Investments
  • Louis Zabel: Managing Director at Keller Zabel Investments
  • Bretton James: Head of Churchill Schwartz
  • Bud fox: a former investor at Bluestar Airlines

Summary of the movie

The movie starts by showing the release of Gordon Gekko, in 2001, from the Otis Federal Prison where he has been serving his 8-year long prison sentence owing to his involvement in insider trading and securities fraud in late 1980s. During his time in the jail, Gordon Gekko had been working on a book named “Is Greed Good?” which he started promoting in 2008, signaling the market about a possible economic downturn. The television promotion done by Gordon was seen by her daughter, Winnie Gekko, who is running a small non-profit news website and is dating a famous trader working at Keller Zabel Investments, named Jacob Moore.

Picture 1

Jacob, an idealist stock trader, is helping Dr. Master, in-charge of a fusion research project at United Fusion Corporation, to raise money and help the world move towards a cleaner source of energy.

As predicted by Gordon Gekko, the US financial markets starts dwindling and Keller Zabel Investments loses 52% of their market capitalization within one week and is forced to seek a bailout package from other banks on the Wall street. But to his dismay, his efforts are proved worthless when Bretton James, the head of a rival firm named Churchill Schwartz, blocks his efforts by stopping other banks to provide a bailout package stating moral hazards. Bretton had a long ongoing rivalry with Louis which dated back to the early days of the DotCom Bubble when Bretton’s firm had a significant exposure to the tech companies. His bank approached Keller Zabel Investments for a bailout, which was rejected by Louis James. Following the fall of Keller Zabel Investments, Louis commits suicide by jumping in front of a train at the station. Everyone in the industry is shocked by the sudden demise of the managing director of Keller Zabel Investments.

Hearing the news about Gordon Gekko’s lecture at Jacob’s alma-mater, Jacob decides to give it a visit. He gets inspired by the speech given by Gordon Gekko and tries to meet him. Soon, Gekko tells Jacob about the involvement of Bretton James in the fall of Keller Zabel Investments (KZI) and the death of his mentor, Louis James. Learning about this, Jacob and Gordon enter into an agreement where Jacob agrees to arrange for a meeting between Gordon and her daughter, and Gordon agrees to dig in for more information about Bretton’s involvement in the fall of the KZI.

Motivated to seek revenge, Jacob spreads false information and rumors to manipulate the market for the stocks of Churchill Schwartz which leads to Bretton losing over $120 million. Impressed by Jacob’s confidence, Bretton offers him a job in his company. Soon, Jacob wins the trust of Bretton when he pulls in a huge amount of investments from Chinese Investors for his Fusion Research Project.

The financial markets start to bleed globally when the subprime mortgages market crashes. Bretton’s company asks for a bailout package from the US Government. Soon Jacob comes to know that Bretton is diverting the funding received from the Chinese Investors to some other solar project and he decides to leave the firm. He visits Gordon who informs him about the profits Bretton has made by betting against the subprime mortgages market by using credit default swaps (CDS) before the crash and at the same time received a bailout package from the US Government.

As said ‘Money Never Sleeps’, Gordon soon deceits his future son-in-law Jacob by wrongfully diverting the funds held in her daughter’s bank account in a Swiss Bank by misleading Jacob. Hearing this news, Winnie breaks up with Jacob and moves on.

Gordon utilizes the $100 million that he received by deceiving Jacob and starts an investment firm in London. He becomes a famous person again with his firm generating $1.1 billion returns on the initial investments.

With the motive to seek revenge, Jacob gathers all evidence against Bretton for his involvement in different frauds and asks Winnie to publish the news on her website. Once the news comes out, Bretton is convicted of several charges and gets fired from his company, Churchill Schwartz.

Following the removal of Bretton, Gordon’s firm enters into a partnership agreement with Churchill Schwartz. The tables turned and Gordon becomes a famous player in the market. In the end, Gordon apologizes to her daughter and Jacob, and is shown to be living a happy life.

The relevance of the Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps movie for the SimTrade course

The Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps movie relates to the SimTrade certificate in many ways:

About theory

  • By taking the Exchange orders course, you will know more about the different type of orders that you can use to buy and sell assets in financial markets.
  • By taking the Market information course, you will understand how information is incorporated into market prices and the associated concept of market efficiency.

Take SimTrade courses

About practice

  • By launching the Sending an Order simulation, you will practice how financial markets really work and how to act in the market by sending orders.
  • By launching the Efficient market simulation, you will practice how information is incorporated into market prices through the trading of market participants, and grasp the concept of market efficiency.

Take SimTrade courses

Famous quote from the Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps movie

“Bulls make money. Bears make money. Pigs? They get slaughtered.” – Gordon Gekko

Trailer of the Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps movie

Related posts on the SimTrade blog

   ▶ All posts about Movies and documentaries

   ▶ Kunal SAREEN Analysis of the Wall Street movie

   ▶ Marie POFF Film analysis: The Wolf of Wall Street

About the author

Article written by Akshit Gupta (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022).