The Ongoing Hyperinflation In Turkey And Its Ripple Effects On European Union

In this article, Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022) talks about the ongoing hyperinflation in Turkey and its ripple effects on European markets.

Introduction

Turkey is facing one of the most severe inflation crises in its modern since 2019. Hyperinflation, marked by an uncontrollable surge in prices, has deeply impacted the Turkish economy and is starting to affect European markets as well. This article delves into the causes behind Turkey’s hyperinflation, its consequences on the Turkish economy, and the broader implications for Europe.

Figure 1. Inflation In Turkey (1960-2024)

Source: World Bank

You can download the Excel file for the data used for the figure above.

Causes Of Hyperinflation In Turkey

Several factors have contributed to Turkey’s current hyperinflation crisis: monetary policy and Central Bank challenges, depreciation of the Turkish Lira, and political and external pressures.

Monetary Policy and Central Bank Challenges

The Turkish administration, led by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has adopted unconventional monetary policies, including lowering interest rates despite high inflation. Erdoğan’s view that high interest rates lead to inflation contradicts established economic theory, leading to frequent rate cuts.
The Central Bank of Turkey has faced issues with its independence, with frequent changes in leadership and government interference undermining the effectiveness of its monetary policy.

Depreciation Of The Turkish Lira

The Turkish lira has seen a sharp decline in value against major currencies like the U.S. dollar and the euro. This currency depreciation has increased the cost of imports, which drives up prices domestically. Given Turkey’s reliance on imported goods, including energy and raw materials, the weakening lira has significantly contributed to inflation.

Political & External Pressures

Internal political instability and external geopolitical tensions have intensified the economic situation.

• Political events, including the 2018 presidential elections and subsequent local elections in 2019, have created uncertainty in the markets. The government’s actions, such as arrests of opposition figures and crackdowns on dissent, have raised concerns about the rule of law and investor confidence.
• The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent recovery have affected global supply chains and commodity prices, putting additional pressure on inflation in Turkey. Rising oil prices, in particular, have hurt Turkey due to its dependence on energy imports.

Global issues, such as rising energy costs and disruptions in supply chains, have also worsened Turkey’s inflation crisis.

Effects On Turkey’s Economy

Hyperinflation has had severe consequences for Turkey: Rising Costs and Living Standards, Devaluation Of Savings & Income, and Challenges For Businesses and Investment.

Rising Costs and Living Standards

The prices of everyday goods and services have soared, placing a heavy burden on Turkish citizens. Essential items like food, fuel, and housing have become increasingly expensive, leading to a marked decline in the quality of life for many people.

Official inflation rates are high, but real rates may be even higher. This has resulted in widespread economic difficulty, with many Turks struggling to afford basic necessities.

Devaluation Of Savings & Income

As the lira depreciates, the value of savings held in lira has diminished. Those on fixed incomes or holding substantial savings in lira are experiencing a severe reduction in their purchasing power.
Wage increases have not matched inflation rates, resulting in a decrease in real wages. This reduction in income has led to lower consumer spending, further hurting economic growth.

Challenges For Businesses and Investment

The hyperinflation crisis has created a turbulent environment for businesses. Rising costs and reduced consumer spending are making it challenging for companies to maintain profitability.
Foreign investors are hesitant to engage with the Turkish market due to concerns about the unstable lira and the government’s economic policies.

Consequences For European Markets

The economic turmoil in Turkey is beginning to influence European markets in several ways: Trade and Supply Chain Interruptions, Financial Market Volatility, and Migration & Social Strain.

Trade and Supply Chain Interruptions

• Impact: Increased costs and disruptions in supply chains are causing delays in production and raising prices for goods in Europe. European companies may either absorb these costs or pass them on to consumers, potentially leading to lower sales and profits.
• Example: European car manufacturers like Volkswagen and Renault are experiencing increased costs and delays because of issues with their Turkish suppliers. For instance, a Turkish automotive parts supplier reported a 30% rise in costs due to the lira’s devaluation, affecting European manufacturers reliant on these components.

Financial Market Volatility

• Impact: Turkey’s financial instability has led to increased volatility in European financial markets. Concerns about potential defaults on Turkish debt may result in tighter credit conditions and impact the profitability of European banks.
• Example: Spanish bank BBVA, which holds a significant investment in Turkey through Garanti BBVA, has been affected by the financial instability in Turkey. The lira’s devaluation and inflation have led to fluctuations in BBVA’s stock price and higher borrowing costs.

Effects On The Euro & Economic Stability

• Impact: The euro’s depreciation in response to Turkey’s crisis could lead to higher import costs for European countries, particularly those that rely on non-Eurozone imports. This might worsen inflationary pressures in Europe and complicate the European Central Bank’s efforts to manage economic growth.
• Example: In late 2022, the euro saw a noticeable decline in value against major currencies, partly due to concerns about the effects of Turkey’s economic situation. As the Turkish lira weakened, European investors and businesses faced greater uncertainty, affecting market sentiment and currency exchange rates.

Migration & Social Strain

• Impact: Increased migration from Turkey could put additional pressure on European social services, such as housing, healthcare, and education. This may heighten political tensions within the EU as member states address how to manage and support the influx of migrants.
• Example: Turkey has been a significant source of migration to Europe, with many people seeking refuge from economic and political instability. The worsening situation in Turkey could lead to more migration to countries like Greece and Italy, which are already dealing with substantial migration challenges.

Conclusion

The hyperinflation crisis in Turkey is a rapidly evolving issue with wide-ranging consequences. While the primary burden falls on the Turkish economy, the repercussions are starting to be felt across Europe. Trade disruptions, financial instability, and potential migration issues are among the challenges that European markets may face due to Turkey’s economic troubles.

The situation underscores the interconnected nature of global economies and the need for Europe to monitor and prepare for potential economic fallout. European policymakers and businesses must stay alert and adaptable in response to the ongoing developments in Turkey.

Addressing Turkey’s hyperinflation will require substantial economic reforms, including restoring central bank independence, stabilizing the currency, and regaining investor confidence. Until these issues are resolved, the economic and social impacts of Turkey’s crisis will continue to challenge both Turkey and Europe.

Related Posts On The SimTrade Blog

▶ Anant JAIN Understanding Hyperinflation

Useful Resources

Data

World Bank Inflation, consumer prices

Economic Analysis

World Bank Turkey Economic Monitor

Financial Times Turkey’s Economic Crisis

BBC News Turkey’s Inflation Crisis

European Central Bank Economic Bulletin

Council on Foreign Relations Turkey’s Economic Struggles

About The Author

The article was written in October 2024 by Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022).

Understanding Debt Ratio & Its Impact On Company Valuation

In this article, Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole – Master in Management, 2019-2022) explain the debt ratio and its importance in firm valuation.

Introduction

In financial analysis, calculating and even evaluating a company’s debt ratio is essential for assessing its financial stability and valuation. The debt ratio provides insights into how a company finances its assets—through debt or equity—and reveals critical information about its risk profile. This article explores the debt ratio in detail, including real-life examples, and discusses its implications for company valuation.

Defining Debt Ratio

The debt ratio is a financial metric that represents the proportion of a company’s assets that are financed by debt.

• Total Debt: This includes all short-term and long-term debt/liabilities. Short-term debt includes financial commitments due within one year, such as accounts payable, commercial paper and short-term loans. Long-term debt consists of liabilities such as bank loans and bonds with repayment periods extending beyond one year.
• Total Assets: This includes all resources owned by the company, such as cash, inventory, property, and equipment.

Sometimes, the debt will include financial debt only (accounts payable being include to the working capital).

Understanding Debt Ratio Values

High Debt Ratio

A high debt ratio indicates that a large portion of a company’s assets is financed through debt. For instance, a debt ratio of 0.70 means that 70% of the company’s assets are debt-financed. High leverage can heighten financial risk, as the probability to repay the capital of the loan and interest is higher, and then the probability of bankruptcy is higher. During economic downturns or revenue drops, companies with high debt ratios might face challenges in maintaining financial stability and avoiding default.

Low Debt Ratio

A low debt ratio suggests that the company relies more on equity financing. For instance, debt ratio of 0.3 implies that 30% of the assets are financed by debt. While this indicates lower financial risk and greater stability, it may also suggest that the company is conservative in leveraging debt (to minimize the cost of bankruptcy).

Implications for Company Valuation

Risk Assessment

The debt ratio can be a valuable metric to assess a company’s risk level. High leverage increases financial risk, which can affect the company’s stock price and valuation. Investors often seek higher returns to compensate for higher risk, potentially leading to a lower stock price if the company is perceived as too risky. This issue has been extensively studied in the academic literature (see the seminal works of Modigliani and Miller (1958 and 1963).

Cost of Capital

WACC (weighted average cost of capital) is the average rate that a business pays to finance its assets. The debt ratio affects a company’s WACC. A higher proportion of debt can reduce the WACC due to the tax benefits associated with interest payments. Lower WACC can increase the company’s valuation by increasing the present value of future cash flows. However, excessive debt might raise the cost of equity as investors demand higher returns to offset increased risk, which could diminish the benefits of a lower WACC.

Figure 2. Calculation Of WACC.

Creditworthiness and Borrowing Capacity

The debt ratio impacts a company’s credit rating and borrowing ability. High debt levels can lead to lower credit ratings, resulting in higher borrowing costs and reduced financial flexibility. This can negatively affect the company’s valuation due to increased financial costs and operational constraints.

Growth Potential

Companies with manageable debt levels may be better positioned to pursue growth opportunities. Effective use of debt can enable investments in expansion, technology, and acquisitions. A moderate debt ratio can suggest that the company is leveraging debt effectively to drive growth without overextending itself. This positive outlook can boost investor confidence and increase the company’s valuation.

Industry Context

Debt ratios should be assessed within the context of industry standards. Different industries have varying norms for acceptable debt levels based on capital requirements, revenue stability, and growth potential. For example:

• Capital-Intensive Industries: Sectors such as utilities, telecommunications, and manufacturing often have higher debt ratios due to substantial capital needs for infrastructure and equipment. In these industries, higher leverage is often necessary and accepted.
• Service and Technology Industries: Companies in service and technology sectors typically have lower capital requirements and may operate with lower debt ratios. High debt levels in these industries could signal potential financial risk or overextension.

Real-Life Examples

Tesla, Inc.

Tesla, renowned for its electric vehicles and energy products, has historically maintained a high debt ratio. For example, Tesla’s debt ratio has been around 0.70 in late 2010s, indicating that 70% of its assets are financed by debt. This high leverage reflects Tesla’s aggressive growth strategy and significant investments in technology and infrastructure. Despite the elevated debt ratio, Tesla’s robust revenue growth and innovative position have led to a high valuation, illustrating that high leverage can be manageable if the company demonstrates strong financial performance and growth potential.

Figure 3. Tesla’s Debt Ratio From 2015 – 2023.

Apple Inc.

Apple, a leading technology company, has a lower debt ratio compared to Tesla. As of its latest financial disclosures in 2024, Apple’s debt ratio stands at almost 0.40. This lower ratio indicates that Apple relies more on equity financing and has a solid balance sheet. Apple’s cautious approach to debt and substantial cash reserves contribute to its high valuation and perceived financial stability. Investors value Apple’s lower risk profile and consistent cash flow generation, which supports a high valuation.

Figure 4. Apple’s Debt Ratio From 2000 – 2024.

General Electric (GE)

General Electric, a large multinational conglomerate, has experienced varying debt ratios over time. Historically, GE has had a high debt ratio, such as in 2000 when it was approximately 0.8. As of 2024, it stands at 0.6. This high leverage was partly due to significant capital investments and acquisitions. During its restructuring phase, the high debt ratio contributed to financial difficulties and a lower stock price (cost due to the restructuring). This example underscores how excessive leverage can impact a company’s valuation and financial health.

Figure 5. General Electric’s Debt Ratio From 2000 – 2024.

Conclusion

The debt ratio is a vital metric for understanding a company’s financial structure and risk profile. Its implications for company valuation are substantial, affecting perceptions of risk, cost of capital, creditworthiness, and growth potential. By analysing the debt ratio alongside other financial indicators and industry benchmarks, investors and analysts can develop a comprehensive understanding of a company’s financial health and make more informed valuation decisions.

Real-world examples, such as Tesla’s high debt ratio versus Apple’s conservative approach, illustrate how different debt levels can influence a company’s valuation and investor perception. A thorough analysis of the debt ratio enables stakeholders to assess a company’s stability, growth prospects, and financial strategy, leading to more accurate and insightful evaluations.

Related Posts On The SimTrade Blog

▶ Rodolphe CHOLLAT-NAMY Why do companies issue debt?

▶ Rodolphe CHOLLAT-NAMY Corporate debt

▶ Rodolphe CHOLLAT-NAMY The rise in corporate debt

▶ Bijal GANDHI Credit Rating

▶ Jayati WALIA Credit risk

▶ Louis DETALLE A quick review of the DCM (Debt Capital Market) analyst’s job…

Useful Resources

Academic references

Modigliani, F., M.H. Miller (1958) “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.

Modigliani, F., M. H. Miller (1963) “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.” American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.

Business resources

Tesla’s Financial Reports

Analysis on Tesla’s Debt

Apple’s Financial Reports

Analysis on Apple’s Debt

GE’s Financial Reports

Analysis on GE’s Debt

Deloitte – Industry Insights

Bloomberg – Company Profiles

About The Author

The article was written in October 2024 by Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Master in Management, 2019-2022).

Milton Friedman VS Archie B. Carroll On CSR

In this article, Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole – Master in Management, 2019-2022) talks about the difference between Milton Friedman and Archie Carroll’s take on corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Introduction

The understanding of CSR has undergone significant transformation over the decades, reflecting a shift in societal values and expectations regarding the role of businesses. Milton Friedman’s influential 1970 article, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits,” argues for a profit-centric approach. Conversely, Archie B. Carroll’s 1991 work, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders,” introduces a more nuanced framework that extends beyond mere profit. This analysis delves into the progression from Friedman’s profit-oriented stance to Carroll’s more inclusive approach, highlighting key case studies that illustrate these concepts.

Milton Friedman’s Perspective

A. Core Argument

• Focus On Shareholder Value
  Friedman posits that the primary duty of business leaders is to maximize shareholder value. He views businesses primarily as economic entities, with profit generation being their principal aim.
• Scope Of Social Issues
  According to Friedman, addressing societal or environmental concerns falls outside the proper scope of business activities. He argues that these issues should be tackled by governments and non-profits rather than by businesses.

B. Justification For Friedman’s View

• Agent-Principal Dynamics
  Friedman’s perspective is based on the principle-agent relationship. Executives, as agents, are tasked with prioritizing shareholder returns, provided they operate within legal and ethical boundaries.
• Legal & Ethical Boundaries
  While Friedman supports profit maximization, he insists that it must be pursued within legal and ethical limits. Nonetheless, he believes these considerations should not detract from the primary goal of profitability.
• Economic Contribution
  Friedman contends that profit maximization leads to economic efficiency and overall societal benefits, including job creation and innovation, which contribute to general economic growth.

C. Case Study: Enron Corporation

• Overview: Enron, once a prominent American energy company, exemplified an intense focus on profit maximization. Its aggressive strategies aimed at boosting financial performance were initially lauded.
• Alignment With Friedman’s View: Enron’s practices were consistent with Friedman’s emphasis on profit. However, the company’s pursuit of financial gains led to severe ethical breaches, including fraudulent accounting practices designed to artificially inflate earnings.
• Outcome: The exposure of Enron’s fraudulent activities in 2001 led to its collapse, resulting in substantial losses for shareholders and employees. This case underscores the potential dangers of prioritizing profit over ethical standards.

Archie B. Carroll’s Perspective

A. The Pyramid Of Corporate Social Responsibility

• Economic Responsibility (Base Level)
  Carroll acknowledges the fundamental need for businesses to be profitable, placing this as the foundation of his CSR pyramid. Profitability is crucial for business sustainability.
• Legal Responsibility (Second Level)
  On top of economic responsibilities, Carroll stresses the importance of adhering to laws and regulations. Businesses are expected to operate within legal boundaries.
• Ethical Responsibility (Third Level)
  Carroll introduces the concept of ethical responsibility, where businesses must uphold ethical norms that go beyond mere legal compliance. This includes fairness and respect for stakeholders.
• Philanthropic Responsibility (Top Level)
  At the peak of the pyramid is philanthropic responsibility. Carroll advocates for voluntary efforts by businesses to contribute positively to society through charitable activities and community engagement.

B. Rationale Behind Carroll’s Model

• Comprehensive Approach
  Carroll’s model marks a shift from a narrow focus on profits to a broader understanding of CSR. By incorporating legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities, it reflects the multifaceted role of businesses in society.
• Moral Obligations
  Carroll’s framework acknowledges that businesses have moral duties that extend beyond financial performance. This perspective aligns with the growing recognition of businesses’ roles in addressing social and environmental issues.
• Strategic Integration
  According to Carroll, CSR should be an integral part of business strategy. Companies adopting this comprehensive approach are better equipped to build stakeholder trust and enhance their overall reputation.

C. Case Study: Patagonia

• Overview: Patagonia, an American outdoor apparel company, is noted for its strong commitment to environmental and social responsibility. The company integrates CSR into its core operations and practices.
• Alignment With Carroll’s Model: Patagonia’s approach embodies Carroll’s multi-dimensional model of CSR:

1. Economic Responsibility: The company remains profitable and operationally sound.

2. Legal Responsibility: It complies with relevant environmental and labor laws.

3. Ethical Responsibility: Patagonia adheres to high ethical standards, including transparency in its supply chain and fair labor practices.

4. Philanthropic Responsibility: The company actively participates in charitable activities and environmental advocacy, such as its 1% for the Planet initiative, which donates a portion of sales to environmental causes.

• Outcome: Patagonia’s dedication to a broad CSR approach has strengthened its reputation, fostered customer loyalty, and made a positive impact on environmental and social issues. The company’s practices illustrate the benefits of aligning profit with a commitment to broader societal responsibilities.

Evolution of Thought

A. From Profit Maximization To Broader Responsibility

• Friedman’s Profit-Centric View: Friedman’s perspective emphasizes profit maximization as the central business objective, with limited consideration for broader social or ethical issues.
• Carroll’s Comprehensive Model: Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR represents a significant shift, incorporating economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. This model recognizes the need for businesses to balance profit with social and ethical obligations.

B. Impact On Modern CSR Practices

• Changing Societal Expectations: The transition from Friedman’s profit-focused approach to Carroll’s broader framework reflects changing expectations, highlighting the importance of businesses contributing positively to society and the environment.
• Influence OSn Business Behavior: Carroll’s model has influenced contemporary CSR practices by encouraging a more integrated and strategic approach. Companies are increasingly engaging in CSR initiatives that align with their values and address stakeholder concerns.
• Corporate Governance: The shift towards Carroll’s model has impacted corporate governance by emphasizing ethical leadership, stakeholder engagement, and long-term value creation.

Conclusion

Milton Friedman’s and Archie B. Carroll’s perspectives represent distinct phases in the evolution of corporate social responsibility. While Friedman’s focus on profit maximization underscores a traditional business objective, Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR introduces a comprehensive framework that includes economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. This evolution highlights a growing recognition of the broader role businesses play in society and the need for a balanced approach to corporate responsibility.

Personal Opinion

The transition from Milton Friedman’s profit-centric view to Archie B. Carroll’s multi-dimensional model of CSR marks a significant shift in how businesses understand their societal role. Friedman’s approach, with its emphasis on profit maximization, represents a traditional view where financial performance is paramount. While this perspective underscores the importance of economic efficiency and shareholder returns, it often overlooks broader social and ethical responsibilities.

In contrast, Carroll’s Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility offers a more comprehensive approach. By integrating economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities, Carroll’s model acknowledges that businesses operate within a complex societal framework. This holistic perspective aligns with contemporary values and recognizes that businesses have a crucial role in addressing social and environmental challenges.

From a modern standpoint, Carroll’s model seems more in tune with the needs and expectations of today’s stakeholders. In an era where corporate behavior is under heightened scrutiny, adopting a balanced approach to CSR can enhance a company’s reputation, build stakeholder trust, and ensure long-term success. Companies that embrace Carroll’s framework are better equipped to navigate complex social and ethical landscapes, foster meaningful community relationships, and drive positive change.

In summary, while Friedman’s focus on profit remains a core element of business, Carroll’s expanded view represents a more progressive understanding of CSR. This evolution reflects a necessary and beneficial shift towards more responsible and impactful business practices.

Related Posts On The SimTrade Blog

▶ Anant JAIN Analysis Of “The Social Responsibility Of Business Is To Create Value For Stakeholders” Article By Freeman And Elms

▶ Anant JAIN Analysis Of The Article “The Pyramid Of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward The Moral Management Of Organizational Stakeholders,” By Archie B. Carroll

▶ Anant JAIN Deep Dive On The Article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits” By Milton Friedman

▶ Anant JAIN Stakeholder

▶ Anant JAIN Shareholder

▶ Anant JAIN Mission Statement

▶ Anant JAIN Writing A Mission Statement

Useful Resources

“The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits” by Milton Friedman

“The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders” by Archie B. Carroll

Harvard Business Review: How Patagonia Is Leading the Way in Corporate Responsibility

Stanford Social Innovation Review: The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility

Business & Society: A Strategic Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility

Bebchuk L, and Tallarita, R. 2020, The illusionary promise of stakeholder governance, Cornell Law Review, 106: 91-177.

About The Author

The article was written in October 2024 by Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Master in Management, 2019-2022).

Understanding Price Elasticity Of Demand

In this article, Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022) introduces the economic concept of price elasticity of demand.

Introduction

Price elasticity of demand (PED) is an important economic concept that measures the impact on the demand of a product or service due to change in the price of that product or service. This concept helps businesses, policymakers, and economists make informed decisions regarding pricing strategies, economic policies, and market analysis.

Definition

Price elasticity of demand measures the degree of change in the quantity demanded of a product or service due to change in the price.

This ratio reveals the extent to which demand for a product shift in response to price changes. For instance, if a product’s price increases by 10% and the quantity demanded decreases by 20%, the PED would be: -20%/10% = -2

The negative value indicates an inverse relationship between price and demand, consistent with the law of demand i.e. if the price of the product increases, then the demand would decrease and vice versa.

Different Methodologies Of Calculating Price Elasticity Of Demand

Point Method

The point method is more precise method than the percentage method because it calculates price elasticity of a demand curve at a specific point. It includes dividing the change in quantity demanded by the price change at a given price and quantity level. This method’s formula is:

Price elasticity = (change in quantity demanded) / (change in price) * (average price / average quantity)

Example:
A shoe retailer notes that when the price of a specific sneaker increases from $60 to $70, the quantity demanded decreases from 200 to 150 sneakers.

Calculation of Price Elasticity:

Change in quantity demanded:
150−200=−50150 – 200 = -50150−200=−50

Change in price:
70−60=1070 – 60 = 1070−60=10

Average price:
(60+70)/2=65(60 + 70) / 2 = 65(60+70)/2=65

Average quantity:
(200+150)/2=175(200 + 150) / 2 = 175(200+150)/2=175

Price Elasticity:
(−50/10)∗(65/175)=−1.86( -50 / 10 ) * ( 65 / 175 ) = -1.86(−50/10)∗(65/175)=−1.86

This example shows that the demand for the sneakers is elastic since the elasticity is greater than 1.

Arc Method

The arc method is used when there is a significant change in the price or quantity demanded between any two points on the demand curve. It is calculated by dividing the change in quantity demanded by the average of the initial and final prices and then dividing that result by the change in price divided by that average. This method’s formula is:

Price elasticity = (change in quantity demanded / average quantity) / (change in price / average price)

Example:
A airline company raises the price of its ticket from $800 to $1,000, resulting in a drop in quantity demanded from 5,000 units to 3,500 tickets.

Calculation of Price Elasticity:

Change in quantity demanded:
3,500−5,000=−1,5003,500 – 5,000 = -1,5003,500−5,000=−1,500

Average quantity:
(5,000+3,500)/2=4,250(5,000 + 3,500) / 2 = 4,250(5,000+3,500)/2=4,250

Change in price:
1,000−800=2001,000 – 800 = 2001,000−800=200

Average price:
(800+1,000)/2=900(800 + 1,000) / 2 = 900(800+1,000)/2=900

Price Elasticity:
(−1,500/4,250)/(200/900)=−1.88\left( -1,500 / 4,250 \right) / \left( 200 / 900 \right) = -1.88(−1,500/4,250)/(200/900)=−1.88

This example shows that the demand for the tickets is elastic.

Types Of Price Elasticity

Elastic Demand (PED > 1)

• Definition: An elastic demand is where demand is highly responsive to price changes. A percentage change in price results in a higher percentage change in the quantity demanded of the product.
• Examples: Non-essential luxury goods such as high-end electronics or designer clothing.
• Implications: Businesses may lower prices to boost sales volumes, potentially increasing total revenue.
• Demand Curve: As shown in Figure 1, when the price decrease from 60 to 50 i.e., 17% decrease in price, the demand increases from 70 to 100 i.e., demand increases by 42%. Therefore, a slight percentage increase in price results in greater percentage increase in the quantity demanded of the good or service. As a result, the demand curve slope is flatter and we get the price elasticity as 42%/-17% = -2.47.

Figure 1. Elastic Demand Curve.

Inelastic Demand (PED < 1)

• Definition: An inelastic demand is where demand is less responsive to price changes. Price increases or decreases have a relatively small effect on the quantity demanded.
• Examples: Essential goods such as basic food items or essential medicines.
• Implications: Companies can raise prices with minimal impact on sales volume, which can enhance revenue and profit margins.
• Demand Curve: As shown in Figure 2, when the price increases from 50 to 70 i.e., 40% increase in price, the demand decreases from 80 to 70 i.e., demand decreases by 12%. Therefore, a slight percentage increase in price results in greater percentage decrease in the quantity demanded of the good or service. As a result, the demand curve slope is stepper and we get the price elasticity as -12%/40% = -0.3.

Figure 2. Inelastic Demand Curve.

Unitary Elasticity (PED = 1)

• Definition: The percentage change in quantity demanded of a product match to the percentage change in price i.e., total revenue remains constant.
• Implications: Price adjustments need to be carefully managed to avoid altering total revenue.
• Demand Curve: As shown in Figure 3, when the price increases from 20 to 30 i.e., 50% increase in price, the demand decreases from 160 to 80 i.e., demand decreases by 50%. Therefore, a slight percentage increase in price results in an equal percentage decrease in the quantity demanded of the good or service. As a result, the price elasticity of demand is -50%/50% = -1.

Figure 3. Unitary Elastic Demand Curve.

Perfectly Elastic Demand (PED = ∞)

Consumers are only willing to buy at a specific price only; any change from this price will result in no demand for the product. This is a more hypothetical case and would not ideally occur in the real world.

As shown in Figure 4, the price is fixed at 50 and the quantity demanded can increase or decrease at this price only. As soon as the price is changed, the demand would become zero. As a result, the demand curve slope is parallel to the X axis and our price elasticity is equal ∞.

Figure 4. Perfectly Elastic Demand Curve.

Perfectly Inelastic Demand (PED = 0)

The quantity demanded of a product will not change irrespective of the change in the price of that product. This is a more hypothetical case and would not ideally occur in the real world.

As shown in Figure 5, the quantity is fixed at 80. Any change in price will make the demand remain at the same level at all times. As a result, the demand curve slope is parallel to the Y axis and our price elasticity is 0/ % change in price = 0.

Figure 5. Perfectly Inelastic Demand Curve.

Factors Influencing Price Elasticity Of Demand

Availability Of Substitutes

• Influence: Products with numerous substitutes tend to have more elastic demand, as consumers can easily switch if prices rise.
• Examples: Butter versus margarine.

Necessity VS Luxury

• Influence: Essential goods generally exhibit inelastic demand since they are crucial for consumers, while luxury items show elastic demand as they are non-essential.
• Examples: Insulin for diabetics (necessity) vs. high-end electronics (luxury).

Proportion Of Income

• Influence: Products that consume a significant portion of a consumer’s income usually have more elastic demand.
• Examples: Major appliances versus inexpensive everyday items.

Time Horizon

• Influence: Demand elasticity can vary over time. In the short term, consumers might not change their purchasing behaviour significantly, but in the long term, they may adjust their habits as alternatives become available.
• Examples: Buying flight ticket due to an emergency versus buying a flight ticket in advance for a holiday

Brand Loyalty

• Influence: Strong brand loyalty can make demand more inelastic, as dedicated consumers may be less sensitive to price increases for their preferred brands.
• Examples: Premium brands like Apple or Rolex.

Implications For Businesses & Policymakers

Pricing Strategies

Businesses use PED to optimize pricing strategies. For products with elastic demand, reducing prices might boost sales volume and total revenue. Conversely, for inelastic products, increasing prices can raise revenue without significantly affecting sales volume.

Taxation & Subsidies

Policymakers consider PED when designing taxes and subsidies. Taxes on inelastic goods, such as cigarettes, may not significantly reduce consumption but can generate substantial revenue. Subsidies on essential goods help make them more affordable and can support sustained demand.

Market Decisions

Understanding PED helps businesses with product pricing, marketing strategies, and inventory management by predicting how changes in price will affect consumer behaviour.

Implications For Financial & Stock Markets

Impact On Company Earnings & Stock Prices

• Revenue Forecasting
  PED assists investors and analysts in forecasting a company’s revenue based on price changes. Firms with inelastic demand may experience stable revenue with price increases, while those with elastic demand might see increased sales volumes with lower prices.
• Profit Margins
  Companies with inelastic demand can adjust prices to protect or enhance profit margins. In contrast, firms with elastic demand might face tighter margins if they need to reduce prices to maintain sales.
• Stock Valuation
  Investors may view companies with inelastic demand as more stable, potentially leading to higher stock valuations. Conversely, companies with elastic demand might be perceived as riskier due to revenue fluctuations.
• Pricing Power
  Pricing power is a key indicator of a company’s strength and profitability in the market. Firms with high pricing power can better withstand inflation, changes in input costs, or competitive pressures, as they have the flexibility to adjust prices to protect margins. It refers to a company’s ability to raise prices without significantly reducing the demand for its products or services. Companies with strong pricing power can increase prices while maintaining profitability because their customers are willing to pay more without switching to competitors or reducing consumption i.e., the company has a more inelastic demand curve.

For example, PED can help an investor understand the impact of change in price in the quantity demanded for an Airline company versus a pharmaceutical company. Since Pharmaceutical products are more necessary compared to an airline ticket, the Airline company has a more elastic demand compared to a pharmaceutical company. As a result, a change in price in an airline company will impact its revenue more than a pharmaceutical company.

Market Reactions To Economic Changes

• Economic Downturns
  During recessions, companies offering inelastic products are generally less affected by reduced consumer spending, making their stocks more attractive during economic uncertainty.
• Inflation
  In inflationary periods, firms with inelastic demand can pass on higher costs with little impact on sales volume, preserving profitability. Companies with elastic demand might face reduced sales as consumers cut back spending.

For example, if we compare a luxury handbag versus milk, hand bag is a luxury item and has a more elastic demand curve compared to milk which is a necessity with a more elastic demand curve. During inflation or recession, consumers will consume milk irrespective of the change in price of the good due to the nature of the product versus consumers may choose to delay or not purchase a handbag because it becomes more of a luxury commodity in such situations.

Investment Strategies & Market Trends

• Sector Performance
  Knowledge of PED aids in assessing sector performance. Sectors with inelastic demand, such as consumer staples, often perform better during economic fluctuations compared to discretionary sectors with elastic demand.
• Mergers & Acquisitions
  Companies with inelastic demand are often attractive acquisition targets due to their stable revenue streams, potentially impacting stock prices and market dynamics.

Regulatory & Policy Impacts:

• Regulatory Changes
  Regulations that impact prices affect companies differently based on their PED. Firms with inelastic demand may absorb or pass on regulatory costs with less effect on demand, influencing market reactions.
• Subsidies
  Government subsidies for essential goods can benefit companies with inelastic demand by maintaining or increasing sales volumes, positively affecting their financial performance and stock valuations.

For example, suppose government provides subsidies to the housing market versus essential medical goods, the consumers will increase their demand more in the housing market since it will become more affordable for the consumers. On the other hand, just because the medical goods become less expensive, consumers will not start purchasing or consuming more medicines due to the subsidy.

Conclusion

Price elasticity of demand is an essential economic concept that helps in understanding consumer behaviour and market dynamics. By grasping PED, businesses can make informed pricing decisions, and policymakers can craft effective policies. Furthermore, PED has significant implications for financial and stock markets, affecting company valuations, investment strategies, and market responses to economic conditions. A thorough understanding of PED provides valuable insights for navigating both consumer and financial markets effectively.

Related Posts On The SimTrade Blog

Useful Resources

Case Study: The Effect of Price Elasticity on Revenue – Starbucks

Case Study: Price Elasticity and Tobacco Products

Case Study: Elasticity of Demand for Luxury Goods

About The Author

The article was written in October 2024 by Anant JAIN (ESSEC Business School, Grande Ecole Program – Master in Management, 2019-2022).